USPTO serial 75334143
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J TODD TIMMERMAN
J TODD TIMMERMAN SHUMAKER LOOP & KENDRICKP O BOX 172609TAMPA, FL 33672-0609UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | rental of and leasing of automated office equipment, namely, photocopiers, typewriters, microfiche duplicators, erasable writing boards with photocopy capability, micrographic equipment, and multifunctional and multitasking office machines which serve as facsimile machines, copiers, printers, modems, and scanners; mail sorting, handling, and receiving services; photocopying services | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1997 |
| 037 | installation, maintenance, and repair of automated office equipment, namely, photocopiers, facsimile machines, computers, computer hardware, computer accessories, typewriters, word processors, printers, microfiche duplicators, erasable writing boards with photocopy capability, micrographic equipment, and multifunctional and multitasking office machines which serve as facsimile machines, copiers, printers, modems, and scanners | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1997 |
| 038 | rental and leasing of telecommunications equipment, namely, facsimile machines; facsimile transmission services | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1997 |
| 041 | training in the use and operation of automated office equipment, namely, photocopiers, facsimile machines, computers, computer hardware, computer accessories, typewriters, word processors, printers, microfiche duplicators, erasable writing boards with photocopy capability, micrographic equipment, and multifunctional and multitasking office machines which serve as facsimile machines, copiers, printers, modems, and scanners | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1997 |
| 042 | retail and wholesale distributorship of and consultation relating to automated office equipment, parts, supplies, consumables, and accessories, namely, photocopiers, facsimile machines, computers, computer hardware, computer accessories, typewriters, word processors, printers, microfiche duplicators, erasable writing boards with photocopy capability, micrographic equipment, multifunctional and multitasking office machines which serve as facsimile machines, copiers, printers, modems, and scanners, and parts, supplies, consumables, and accessories therefor; rental and leasing of computers, computer hardware, computer accessories, word processors, printers, and laser printers; management of office facsimile, mail, photocopying, printing, and reprographic facilities; management and storage of files and records; ordering, receiving, fulfillment, shipping, and billing services; printing services | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |