Drawing for OMEGA METER

USPTO serial 75334378

OMEGA METER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OMEGA METER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT W CLARIDA

ROBERT W CLARIDA COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009apparatus for measuring the residual ionic contamination of electronic parts, components and printed wiring assembliesACTIVESep 23, 1975

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 24, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 24, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 8, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 30, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 16, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 16, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 10, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 10, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance