Drawing for SEYMOUR FLIX

USPTO serial 75334586

SEYMOUR FLIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEYMOUR FLIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne L. Cornelius

ANNE L CORNELIUS MCI WORLDCOM BRANDS, LLC1133 NINETEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038telecommunication services featuring a bonus program by which certificates for video rentals are issued based upon usage of telecommunication servicesACTIVEAug 16, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2002ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
May 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 9, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 18, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 18, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 10, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 18, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance