USPTO serial 75334594
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Blattner
JOHN C BLATTNER DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC350 S MAIN STREET SUITE 300ANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | handbags, backpacks, fanny packs, tote bags, cosmetic cases sold empty | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 1989 |
| 025 | pants, shirts, shorts, jackets, sweatshirts, sweaters, T-shirts, blouses, sweatsuits, rainwear, coats, dresses, vests, knit tops, leotards, robes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2018 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | TTPR | BOARD DECISION SET ASIDE; PROCEEDING REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 11, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |