Drawing for BRENDA PRETENDER

USPTO serial 75334840

BRENDA PRETENDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRENDA PRETENDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MITCHELL E RADIN

MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS, SUNGLASSES, PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPES AND COMPACT DISC FEATURING ANIMATED MOVIE AND TELEVISION SHOW EPISODESACTIVE—
016CHILDREN'S BOOKS, COLORING BOOKS, PLAYING CARDS, CARTOON PRINTS AND CARTOON STRIPSACTIVE—
025CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, DRESSES, SLACKS, SHORTS, SWEATERS, SHIRTS, PANTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, UNDERCLOTHES, HATS, CAPS, SOCKS, TIGHTS, RAINWEAR, PONCHOS, BOOTS, GALOSHES, GLOVES, MITTENS, SNEAKERS, SHOES, FOOTWEAR, HEADBANDS, SWIMWEAR, SUITS, PAJAMAS, BERETS, SCARVES, UNDERWEAR, BATHROBES, SLIPPERS, SLEEPWEAR, HALLOWEEN AND MASQUERADE COSTUMESACTIVE—
028ACTION FIGURES, DOLLS AND DOLL ACCESSORIES, DOLL HOUSE, DOLL HALLOWEEN COSTUMES; DOLL MASQUERADE COSTUMES, TOY FURNITURE, TOY SLEEPING BAGS, BOARD GAMES, STUFFED TOYS, TOY JEWELRY, TOY COSMETICS, TOY BEAUTY AIDS, TOY DISHES, TOY POTS AND PANS, TOY MUGS AND CUPS, TOY LUNCHBOXESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 25, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2005REINREINSTATED—
Jun 20, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 28, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 20, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 23, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 11, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 31, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 10, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance