USPTO serial 75334840
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MITCHELL E RADIN
MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS, SUNGLASSES, PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPES AND COMPACT DISC FEATURING ANIMATED MOVIE AND TELEVISION SHOW EPISODES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | CHILDREN'S BOOKS, COLORING BOOKS, PLAYING CARDS, CARTOON PRINTS AND CARTOON STRIPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, DRESSES, SLACKS, SHORTS, SWEATERS, SHIRTS, PANTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, UNDERCLOTHES, HATS, CAPS, SOCKS, TIGHTS, RAINWEAR, PONCHOS, BOOTS, GALOSHES, GLOVES, MITTENS, SNEAKERS, SHOES, FOOTWEAR, HEADBANDS, SWIMWEAR, SUITS, PAJAMAS, BERETS, SCARVES, UNDERWEAR, BATHROBES, SLIPPERS, SLEEPWEAR, HALLOWEEN AND MASQUERADE COSTUMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | ACTION FIGURES, DOLLS AND DOLL ACCESSORIES, DOLL HOUSE, DOLL HALLOWEEN COSTUMES; DOLL MASQUERADE COSTUMES, TOY FURNITURE, TOY SLEEPING BAGS, BOARD GAMES, STUFFED TOYS, TOY JEWELRY, TOY COSMETICS, TOY BEAUTY AIDS, TOY DISHES, TOY POTS AND PANS, TOY MUGS AND CUPS, TOY LUNCHBOXES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |