Drawing for TRANS ACCESS THE GLOBAL ACCESS SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75334944

TRANS ACCESS THE GLOBAL ACCESS SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANS ACCESS THE GLOBAL ACCESS SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER D AUFRICHTIG

PETER D AUFRICHTIG AUFRICHTIG STEIN & AUFRICHTIG PC300 E 42ND ST 5TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009voice and data telecommunications systems comprising user terminals for interfacing a user's voice and data receiving and transmitting traffic and switching office collector terminals for collecting user voice and data traffic and distributing and switching that voice and data information through telephone and data networksACTIVE—
038voice and data telecommunications services, namely providing for collecting and switching the voice and data telecommunications services from multiple users through a central switching facility to provide increased band width voice and data communication between the user site and other voice and data sources and destinationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 7, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 9, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 1, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 28, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance