USPTO serial 75334974
MIREDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIREDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, SE4 2NL, GB
London, SE4 2NL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD S MACMILLAN
RICHARD S MACMILLAN MACMILLAN SOBANSKI & TODD1 MARITIME PLZ 4TH FL720 WATER STTOLEDO, OH 43604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in data processing systems, namely, computer programs for developing other software; process management software, namely software which enables users to design, execute, manage, administer and automate business processes; computer programs namely for database management; computer networking software which facilitates exchange of data between two or more computers within a local area network or a wide area network or a global computer network environment; computer programs, namely, utility programs; remote collaboration software, namely, software which permits sharing of computer software application programs between remote users connected by telephone; computer software which facilitates the playing of interactive computer games and related entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, recovery of computer data; computer programming for others; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; computer software design for others; computer software analysis for others; rental of computer software; computer consultation for the design and development of computer software for individuals and businesses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |