Drawing for NIGHT VISION

USPTO serial 75335112

NIGHT VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NIGHT VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SURJIT P SONI

SURJIT P SONI THE SONI LAW FIRM225 S LAKE AVE FL 8PASADENA, CA 91101-3005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014watchesACTIVEDec 23, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2001PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Aug 30, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 2, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 22, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Apr 7, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance