USPTO serial 75335135
BON BRIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BON BRIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santafe de Bogota, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tim J. Humphrey
TIM J HUMPHREY ESQ THE CLOROX COMPANY1221 BROADWAYOAKLAND, CA 94612-1837UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | sponges for household purposes, steel wool and steel wool pads, cloths for cleaning, and gloves for household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |