USPTO serial 75335359
SUPER DIODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 1999
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPER DIODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
Hsin Tien, Taipei Hsien, TW
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
Hsin Tien, Taipei Hsien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAM LOUIE
301 N LAKE AVE STE 800PASADENA, CA 91101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Diodes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| May 20, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |