USPTO serial 75335478
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MERTER HELVA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Merter, Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by MERTER HELVA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
MERTER HELVA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Merter, Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by MERTER HELVA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
MERTER HELVA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Merter, Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by MERTER HELVA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S EGBERT
John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices412 Main St.. 7th FloorHouston, TX 77002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | crushed sesame seeds, jam, peanut butter, hazelnut butter, glaceed fruit, candied dried fruit, and chestnut glacee | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | May 29, 1998 |
| 030 | bakery goods, namely, halvah and Turkish delight; fruit topping syrup, honey, sweet pastries, candy, milk candy, fruit candy, lemon candy, strawberry candy, orange candy, caramel, fondant, cacao candy, chocolate candy, toffee, coffee candy, aromatic candy, peppermint candy, cream candy, almond candy, coconut candy, sugar candy and crystallized sugar | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | May 29, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |