Drawing for SUBLIME

USPTO serial 75335784

SUBLIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2294943Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 30, 1999
Examiner
LAUTERBACH, JODI
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUBLIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric J. Goodman, Esq.

Jeremiah Reynolds Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump & Aldisert LLP808 Wilshire Blvd.Third FloorSanta Monica, CA 90401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016posters, books related to music, calendars, decals, and stickersEXPIREDNov 2, 1991
025clothing, namely, T-shirts, shirts, sweat shirtsEXPIREDNov 2, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Feb 18, 2010TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Feb 18, 2010CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 18, 2010CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Dec 9, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 9, 2009PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 2, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 18, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Mar 18, 2009CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 18, 2009CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jul 28, 2008PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 27, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 20, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2005C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 24, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 6, 2005815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 6, 2005E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 1999R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 7, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 25, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance