USPTO serial 75335920
NORMA BEA'S KITCHEN FAMILY QUICK MEALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NORMA BEA'S KITCHEN FAMILY QUICK MEALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, and/or vegetables; frozen side dishes consisting primarily of vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | frozen sandwiches; frozen ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; frozen side dishes consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |