USPTO serial 75335997
ICL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ICL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN K. FITZGERALD
JOHN K FITZGERALD FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT, LLP6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045-1598UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | intraocular refractive correction lenses for insertion into the eye | ACTIVE | Apr 18, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |