USPTO serial 75336111
Y2K
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Y2K?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE W LONGBOTTOM
BRUCE W LONGBOTTOM LEAGRE CHANDLER & MILLARD1400 1ST INDIANA PLZ135 N PENNSYLVANIA STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronics network, advertising slogan and character licensing, rental of advertising space, retail apparel stores services, billboard advertising, character licensing, merchandise catalog services, promoting the sale of goods and services of other through the distribution of printed material and contests, developing promotional campaigns for business, promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of discount cards, electronic billboard advertising, electronic retailing services in the field of retail merchandise via a computer network, retail gift shop services, retail jewelry store services, mail order catalog services featuring a variety of merchandise, mail order services, providing merchandising display services for the goods and services and others, on-line ordering services, on-line retail store services featuring a variety of merchandise, organizing trade show exhibitions in the field of technology, promoting the goods and services of others by arranging for sponsors, providing home shopping services featuring a variety of merchandise by means of television, retail stores, retail store services through computer communications and interactive television, stores featuring phone in orders, telephone shop-at-home services, trade show exhibitions, creating trademarks for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |