USPTO serial 75336218
CAR NAVI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAR NAVI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA A LARSEN
BARBARA A LARSEN BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | navigation system for vehicles, comprised of graphic display unit, heading and trip distance sensors, global positioning sensor antenna, computer hardware and CD-ROM player | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |