Drawing for T-TEC LABS

USPTO serial 75336387

T-TEC LABS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T-TEC LABS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY N MAUSNER

JEFFREY N MAUSNER BERMAN BLANCHARD MAUSNER & RESSER4727 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90010-3874UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN MANAGING AND ACCESSING DATA BASES FOR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES THAT CUSTOMERS INQUIRE ABOUT FOR SALES, SERVICE, AND OR TECHNICAL SUPPORT, AND FOR PROVIDING EMPLOYEE TRAINING; INTERACTIVE KIOSK SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF KIOSKS, VIDEO MONITORS, CAMERAS, SPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, COMPUTER, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE F0R PROVIDING CUSTOMER SERVICE, SALES AND SUPPORT AND TO CONTROL THE AUDIO VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN KIOSKSACTIVE—
041PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL SEMINARS AND COURSES OF INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELDS OF TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, TELEMARKETING, AND TELESERVICING, IN THE NATURE OF RECEIVING AND RESPONDING TO TELEPHONE INQUIRIES FROM CUSTOMERS OF OTHER BUSINESSESACTIVE—
042CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, COMPUTER SYSTEMS, DATABASE COMPILING AND MANAGEMENT, AND INTERACTIVE ELECTRONIC KIOKS SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES; COMPUTER DATABASE COMPILATION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; RESEARCH AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, TELEMARKETING, TELESERVICING, AND MULTIMEDIAELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; PROVIDING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER DISASTER RECOVERY SERVICES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 14, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance