USPTO serial 75336544
AGRILINK FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2683904Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 4, 2003
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AGRILINK FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ROCHESTER, NY
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN B SALAI
STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER, SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | potato chips, kettle potato chips, flavored potato chips, namely, barbecue flavored chips, Cajun flavored potato chips, salt and vinegar flavored potato chips, Coney Island flavored potato chips, cheese and garlic flavored potato chips, sour cream and onion flavored potato chips, jalapeno pepper flavored potato chips; and refrigerated chip dip; preserved, dried, cooked or frozen fruits and vegetables; soups; jellies; fruit sauces; dairy products excluding ices cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats, meat extracts; baking jams and fruit preserves; canned fruits; canned soup; canned vegetables; fruit compotes and fillings for cakes and pies; frozen coconuts; fruit toppings; fruit based glazes; fruit based fillings for pies; sauerkraut; peanut butter; chili, chili with beans, turkey chili, onion chili, lima beans with ham, onion chili with beans, cheddar cheese chili with beans, turkey chili, beef stew, corned beef hash, pickles, processed peppers, refrigerated dips, namely, chip dip, vegetable dip, bacon and onion dip, ranch dip, dill dip, French onion dip, garlic dip, avocado dip, clam dip, cheese dip, and guacamole dip; shelf stable microwave entrees consisting primarily of meat and/or vegetables; namely, beef stew, chili with beans, chicken and vegetables with pasta, clam chowder, cheddar cheese chili, scalloped potatoes and ham; shelf stable dips; seasoned French fried potatoes; cheese French fried potatoes; pork rinds; salted peanuts and cashews; kippered beef; jerky; and non-dairy chip dips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIRDS EYE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LINDEN OAKS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LINDEN OAKS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LINDEN OAKS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named AGRILINK FOODS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 5, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |