USPTO serial 75336963
PARI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARI GMBH SPEZIALISTEN FUR EFFEKTIVE INHALATION
D-82319 Starnberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by PARI GMBH SPEZIALISTEN FUR EFFEKTIVE INHALATION
PARI GMBH SPEZIALISTEN FUR EFFEKTIVE INHALATION
D-82319 Starnberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by PARI GMBH SPEZIALISTEN FUR EFFEKTIVE INHALATION
D-82319 Starnberg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBIN C VANCE
ROBIN C VANCE MCGUIRE WOODS BATTLE & BOOTHE LLP1 JAMES CTR901 E CARY STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of respiratory diseases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PARI GMBH SPEZIALISTEN FUR EFFEKTIVE INHALATION
- Other trademarks owned by PARI GMBH SPEZIALISTEN FUR EFFEKTIVE INHALATION
- Other trademarks owned by Paul Ritzau Pari-Werk GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named PARI
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |