USPTO serial 75337024
DYNAMIC REAL ESTATE GROWTH TRUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3610713Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 28, 2009
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DYNAMIC REAL ESTATE GROWTH TRUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5H 4A9, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO M5H 4A9, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIDGE M HYMAN
MIDGE M. HYMAN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | managing mutual funds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Goodman & Company Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE BANCORP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named DYNAMIC REAL ESTATE GROWTH TRUST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |