USPTO serial 75337099
DYNAMIC REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNAMIC REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M5H 4A9, CA
DUNDEE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH LTD.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH LTD.
TORONTO, ONTARIO M5H 4A9, CA
TORONTO, ONTARION, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIDGE M HYMAN
MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Mutual funds investment services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Goodman & Company Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE BANCORP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named DYNAMIC REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |