Drawing for SPORTSMAN 2000

USPTO serial 75337121

SPORTSMAN 2000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, CHERYL L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPORTSMAN 2000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID L MARKS

DAVID L MARKS DAVID L MARKS CHARTERED305 W CHESAPEAKE AVE STE 100TOWSON, MD 21204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer program that automates sport hunting, fishing, boating, vessel titling, off-road vehicle registration, and commercial licensing processesABANDONEDFeb 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 25, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance