USPTO serial 75337263
BAILEY HARTMANN & BRAUN SYMPHONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAILEY HARTMANN & BRAUN SYMPHONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1102 BR AMSTERDAM, NL
1102 BR AMSTERDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL M RICKIN
MICHAEL M RICKIN LEGAL DEPT 4S1ELSAG BAILEY INC29801 EUCLID AVEWICKLIFFE, OH 44092-1898Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Process Control instrumentation, namely, human interface units, namely, operator stations, and engineering stations, enclosures for human interface units and process control units, all for use in connection with continuous and batch-oriented processes in industries such as electric utilities, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, oil and gas, metals and ceramics, pulp and paper, water and wastewater treatment, food and beverage | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1999 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |