Drawing for PRAIRIE COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 75337365

PRAIRIE COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PRAIRIE COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRIAN L ALPERT

BRIAN L ALPERT SILVER FREEDMAN & TAFF LLP7TH FL E 1100 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail sales and wholesale distributorship in the field of computer hardware and software, cellular telephones and other personal communication devices, and related merchandiseABANDONED—
037installation of computer networks, installation of computer systems and maintenance of computer hardwareABANDONED—
038telecommunications gateway services, namely, providing access and connectivity to globally interconnected computer networks linked by common protocols; the sale and leasing of telecommunication equipment; and the resale of wireless telecommunications air timeABANDONED—
042computer software design for others, namely, the creation of home pages for the display of information and graphics to be transmitted via globally interconnected computer networks linked by common protocols; and computer site design, namely, the creation and management of computer file servers used to transmit information via said networks; computer consultation, namely, assistance in the creation of information via said networks; computer consultation, namely, assistance in the creation of information content to be transmitted via said networksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance