Drawing for BIOLASTIC

USPTO serial 75337551

BIOLASTIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOLASTIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELISABETH TOWNSEND BRIDGE

ELISABETH TOWNSEND BRIDGE WHYTE HIRSCHBOECK DUDEK SC111 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007peristaltic pumps, for industrial processes; peristaltic pump tubing and associated tube fittings sold together as a unit to enable attachment of the tubing to other parts of the pumping apparatusACTIVE—
009tubes, pipework and tubing for scientific and laboratory purposes, as well as for use in biotechnology and bio-medicine; flexible tubes, pipework and tubing for peristaltic pumps used for scientific and laboratory purposes; and plastic tubing for the delivery of liquids for scientific and laboratory useACTIVE—
010piping and tubing for the delivery of liquids through a peristaltic pump process, all for surgical, medical, dental and veterinary useACTIVE—
017non-metal flexible tubes and non-metal flexible pipes, all for the delivery of liquids; plastic tubing for the delivery of liquids for use in the food, beverage, bio-technology and pharmaceutical industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 3, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 22, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 29, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 23, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 29, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 23, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance