USPTO serial 75337556
BOGDANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOGDANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMIE R SCHOLSS
11755 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1400LOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | CREAMS, NAMELY; ANTI-AGING CREAM; ANTI-WRINKLE CREAM; BODY CREAM; BODY MASK CREAM; COLD CREAM; HAND CREAM; NIGHT CREAM; SKIN CLEANSING CREAM; SKIN CREAM | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations, namely, dietetic substances adapted for medical use, namely, food for medically restricted diets, food for diabetics, food for enterel feeding, food supplements, meal replacement drinks, meal replacement powders, diet pills; antibiotic creams; anti-itch cream; antibiotic salves and ointments | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1984 |
| 030 | Food products, namely ready to eat cereal derived snack bars , cocoa and chocolate, processed grains, honey, and candy | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | agricultural products and grains not included in other classes, namely, unprocessed grains for eating, and confectionery products, namely, bon-bons | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1984 |
| 042 | health and hygiene services, namely, medical care related to health and beauty needs, consultation and recommendations regarding health and beauty needs, beauty consultation relating to diet and exercise, hygiene care and consulting services, and beauty care services and beauty care consulting | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bogdana Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BOGDANA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |