USPTO serial 75337714
ILUSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ILUSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
INTERNET LIQUIDATORS INTERNATIONAL INC.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERNET LIQUIDATORS INTERNATIONAL INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN G SMITH
KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computerized online retail services featuring a wide range of consumer products and general merchandise | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |