USPTO serial 75337868
MAX PULL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 1999
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MAX PULL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BLAUSTEIN, DE
D-89134 Blaustein, DE
D-89134 Blaustein, DE
D-89134 Blaustein, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Snider
Matthew J. Snider Dickinson Wright PLLC1825 Eye St. N.W., Suite 900International SquareWashington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | industrial heavy-duty fabrics specifically made for the manufacture of machine parts; machine parts, namely, belts for industrial purposes; machine parts of corrugating machines, namely, conveyor belts and straps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MÜHLEN SOHN GMBH & CO. KG.
- Other trademarks owned by Muhlen Sohn GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Muhlen Sohn GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Muhlen Sohn GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MAX PULL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 20, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 20, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 26, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2000 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |