USPTO serial 75337927
ONEBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2290800Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 1999
- Examiner
- WOLFSON, FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONEBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA B TAKAHASHI
MARTY ALBERT AMERSCAN3609 E THOUSAND OAKS BLVDSTE 208THWESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91362Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | local area and wide area networking communication systems, comprised of a processing module plus one or more modules, such as - Local Area Network (LAN) module, asynchronous transfer module (ATM), voice communication modules, wide-area network (WAN) modules for attachment to Integrated Services Network ISDN, point to point, and frame relay networks; data authentication and data encryption modules to provide and integrated single platform for global network/virtual private networking applications, and networking computer software programs which support such routing protocols as Routing Information Protocol ( RIP), and Open Shortest Path First Protocol (OSPF), frame relay, local area network protocols with built-in management capabilities that may be accessed from network browsers and Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)-based computer systems | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2003 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |