USPTO serial 75337933
SEA DRAGOOON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEA DRAGOOON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAUSHAL R ODEDRA
KAUSHAL R ODEDRA WENDEROTH LIND & PONACK LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting motion picture screenings for others, variety entertainment performances, namely, entertainer services, theatrical performances and musical performances; production of motion picture films; distribution and production of motion picture films; production and presentation of theatrical performances, musical performances and radio and television broadcast programs; providing audio and video recording studios, providing amusement arcades; rental of motion picture projectors and accessories, rental of motion picture film; booking seats for movie shows and entertainer services, video tape editing and dubbing, rental of audio tape recording equipment, rental of theatrical sets, rental of lighting apparatus for television studios, rental of video cameras; scriptwriting services; rental of phonographic records, magnetic data media, and optical data media; production of videotapes for education, culture, entertainment and sports (exclusive of movie videos, broadcast program videos, and advertisement videos); rental of videotapes for photographic slide transparencies (exclusive of movie videos, broadcast programs videos, and advertisement videos); operating and handling image machines, video machines, audio machines and instruments for producing broadcast programs for others; providing facilities for theatrical performances, musical performances, and educational purposes, namely, movie theater facilities, music halls and recreation facilities; rental of amusement equipment, namely, arcade TV game equipment for amusement parks; rental of motion pictures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |