Drawing for J. WALKERS

USPTO serial 75338158

J. WALKERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with J. WALKERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARY L KEVLIN

ROBERT STONEHILL SILVERBERG STONEHILL & GOLDSMITH PC111 W 40TH STNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025shoesABANDONEDJul 10, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISIONโ€”
Jan 11, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISIONโ€”
Jan 11, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999โ€”
Jan 11, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999โ€”
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jan 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jan 7, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
Oct 5, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 7, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
May 16, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Apr 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Feb 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
May 5, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance