USPTO serial 75338335
PARTS MASTER ULTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARTS MASTER ULTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRY B RAY
HARRY B RAY GRANT KONAVLINKA & HARRISON PCREPUBLIC CTR633 CHESTNUT ST 9TH FLCHATTANOOGA, TN 37450Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automobile brake parts, namely, disc brake pads | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |