Drawing for PARTS MASTER ULTRA

USPTO serial 75338335

PARTS MASTER ULTRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARTS MASTER ULTRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HARRY B RAY

HARRY B RAY GRANT KONAVLINKA & HARRISON PCREPUBLIC CTR633 CHESTNUT ST 9TH FLCHATTANOOGA, TN 37450

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012automobile brake parts, namely, disc brake padsACTIVEJun 30, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 10, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 30, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 30, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 30, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 24, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 9, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 20, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 21, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 16, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance