Drawing for LET'S TALK CELLULAR & WIRELESS

USPTO serial 75338739

LET'S TALK CELLULAR & WIRELESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LET'S TALK CELLULAR & WIRELESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAZARUS ROTHSTEIN

LAZARUS ROTHSTEIN LEGAL DEPT800 BRICKELL AVE 4TH FL5200 NW 77TH CTMIAMI, FL 33166

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009communications apparatus, namely, cellular and other types of wireless portable telephones and communicators, batteries, telephone and beeper cases; trickle chargers, rapid chargers, vehicle rapid chargers, general chargers, car cords/battery savers, hands-free car kits comprised of a speaker, microphones, cradle, data cable and antenna antennas, cradles/pedestals/brackets personal digital assistants; beepers/pagers, beeper chains, auto alarms, radar detectors, cordless telephones, long-range cordless telephones, non-cordless single-line telephones, novelty telephones, fax machines, fax and phone accessories, namely, data interface cables, home appliance batteries and Internet access devices and softwareABANDONED—
038communications services, namely, cellular telephone and other wireless communication servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2000PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Apr 28, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance