USPTO serial 75338859
DAVIDSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAVIDSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Nicolas De Los Garza, N.L., MX
LOUISVILLE, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRYAN K. WHEELOCK
BRYAN K WHEELOCK HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC7700 BONHOMME AVE STE 400ST LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CUPRUM, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by LOUISVILLE LADDER GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named DAVIDSON
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |