Drawing for SAF-T-LITE

USPTO serial 75339270

SAF-T-LITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAF-T-LITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD M SACCOCIO

150 SE 12TH STFT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019laminated leaded glass panels or panesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 21, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 13, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 15, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance