Drawing for INFOCENTER

USPTO serial 75339274

INFOCENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2708084Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 15, 2003
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INFOCENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven B. Smith

Steven B. Smith HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP90 S. CASCADE AVE., SUITE 1300COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for providing a customized, on-line database for use in contact management for use by businesses in marketing activities involving a networked group and distributed environmentSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 11, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 4, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 22, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Apr 3, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 20, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 27, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 20098.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Feb 12, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 6, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2009ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
May 15, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 15, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 5, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 5, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jan 28, 2003CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance