USPTO serial 75339577
NORMA VIRGIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NORMA VIRGIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WINSTON V BEARD
BEAUTY FOR ALL SEASONS, INCP O BOX 1950LA PUENTE, CA 91749-1950UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and skin care products, namely, skin conditioning creams and gels, facial and skin cleansers; skin toners, skin moisturizing creams and gels, exfoliators, eye shadow, blush, lipstick; facial and skin beauty creams and gels; makeup base, mascara, eyebrow pencils; cosmetic pencils, namely, for the eye and lip | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |