Drawing for CITY FLAVORS

USPTO serial 75339599

CITY FLAVORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CITY FLAVORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAY H BEGLER

JAY H BEGLER HARRIS BEACH & WILCOX LLP530 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036-5101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035advertising of restaurants through the publication and promotion of video guidesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 15, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 3, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 5, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance