USPTO serial 75339819
PEOPLETEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEOPLETEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
OTTO O LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP12 S FIRST ST 12TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |