USPTO serial 75340339
DEEP FIBER SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2516009Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2001
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEEP FIBER SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cleveland, OH
CLEVELAND, OH
CLEVELAND, OH
CLEVELAND, OH
Dallas, TX
ADVANCED FIBRE ACCESS CORPORATION
PETALUMA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda Ross Kottis
Linda Ross Kottis TELLABS OPERATIONS, INC.1415 WEST DIEHL ROADMAIL STOP 16NAPERVILLE, IL 60563Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | communication network systems development, and testing of voice, data and video transmission equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RELTEC Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by MARCONI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MARCONI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MARCONI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TELLABS BEDFORD, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED FIBRE ACCESS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DEEP FIBER SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 30, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |