USPTO serial 75340358
WORX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WORX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL A. WELTER
PAUL A WELTER MERCHANT &GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear, namely work boots and shoes, and not utility gloves | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |