Drawing for STATISTICAL MACHINE CONTROL

USPTO serial 75340628

STATISTICAL MACHINE CONTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRIEGEL, ADAM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STATISTICAL MACHINE CONTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTOPHER A. VANDERLAAN

CHRISTOPHER A VANDERLAAN LYON & LYON LLP633 W 5TH ST STE 4700LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for controlling semiconductor processing equipmentACTIVEJul 30, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 8, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 9, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 7, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 10, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 30, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance