USPTO serial 75340637
FOOD CITY'S HEALTHFUL HINTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOOD CITY'S HEALTHFUL HINTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY H FECHTER
GARY H FECHTER HALL DICKLER KENT FRIEDMAN & WOOD LLP909 3RD AVE 27TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed publications, namely, newsletters, pamphlets, flyers, brochures, posters and signs concerning diet, nutrition, health and exercise | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, providing information on nutrition, health and exercise by means of a global computer network, television and radio programming on the subject of diet, nutrition, health and exercise | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing information on diet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by K-V-A-T Food Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by K-V-A-T Food Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FOOD CITY'S HEALTHFUL HINTS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |