USPTO serial 75340638
NATURELAND ORGANIC LAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATURELAND ORGANIC LAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pacific Western Brewing Company Ltd.
Burnaby, BC, CA
Other trademarks owned by Pacific Western Brewing Company Ltd.
PACIFIC PINNACLE INVESTMENTS LTD. CARRYING ON BUSINESS AS PACIFIC WESTERN BREWING CO.
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
PACIFIC PINNACLE INVESTMENTS LTD. CARRYING ON BUSINESS AS PACIFIC WESTERN BREWING CO.
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS T JOHNSON
DOUGLAS T JOHNSON MILLER & MARTINSTE 1000 VOLUNTEER BLDG832 GEORGIA AVECHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Western Brewing Company Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by PACIFIC PINNACLE INVESTMENTS LTD. CARRYING ON BUSINESS AS PACIFIC WESTERN BREWING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by PACIFIC PINNACLE INVESTMENTS LTD. CARRYING ON BUSINESS AS PACIFIC WESTERN BREWING CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named NATURELAND ORGANIC LAGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |