Drawing for INTERNATIONAL E-COMMERCE NETWORK

USPTO serial 75341100

INTERNATIONAL E-COMMERCE NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THAYER, GARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTERNATIONAL E-COMMERCE NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGORY ALAN RUTNICK

GREGORY ALAN RUTNICK THE ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY GRP27 W 75TH STNEW YORK, NY 10023-2090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial services, namely, on-line payment processing to enable a user to purchase products and access on-line with a creadit or bank card in a secure fashionABANDONEDJul 17, 1997
042on-line services, namely, web-hosting and Internet-based communications related to adult entertainment and informationABANDONEDJul 17, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance