USPTO serial 75341660
OLIVER MACLEOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3710741Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 2009
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OLIVER MACLEOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DETROIT, MI
Security Chimneys International, Ltd.
Laval, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Security Chimneys International, Ltd.
Security Chimneys International, Ltd.
Laval, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Security Chimneys International, Ltd.
Security Chimneys International, Ltd.
Laval, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Security Chimneys International, Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry E. Vierra
Larry E. Vierra Vierra Magen Marcus LLP575 Market Street, Suite 3750San Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DURAVENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Security Chimneys International, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Security Chimneys International, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Security Chimneys International, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named OLIVER MACLEOD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |