USPTO serial 75342208
MTAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MTAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES P QUILLEN JR
JAMES P QUILLEN JR HODES ULMAN PESSIN & KATZ PA901 DULANEY VALLEY RD STE 400TOWSON, MD 21204-2600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic toll collection system on toll highways and bridges within the State of Maryland | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1999 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 17, 1999 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |