USPTO serial 75342285
ENCHARGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENCHARGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH H OHRINER
NORMAN J PROVOST SEMPRA ENERGYHQ-11101 ASH STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | utility billing and information management services, namely, utility bill auditing and verification; summary billing services; tariff review services and usage analysis services; and consulting services rendered in connection therewith | ACTIVE | Sep 22, 1997 |
| 036 | payment processing services | ACTIVE | Sep 22, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 7, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |