USPTO serial 75342694
NF NET FORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCNUTT, GEOFF
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NF NET FORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Boca Raton, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD H ROSENTHAL
EDWARD H ROSENTHAL FRANKFURT GARBUS KLEIN & SELZ PC488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | stuffed toys, dolls, toy actions figures and accessories therefor, toy action figure kits and parts thereof, toy weapons, action skill games, board games, hand held units for playing electronic games, flying discs, kites, pool floats for recreation use, inflatable toy figures, jigsaw puzzles, hobby arts and craft kits for toy models and balloons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |