USPTO serial 75342887
EPC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2406604Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2000
- Examiner
- WARD, JOYCE A.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell A. Tuchman
MITCHELL A TUCHMAN WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLCPO BOX 13069RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | removable protective spray-on liquid coatings and films, used when dry to protect delicate surfaces from damage during building and boat construction | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ESSENTIALS FRANCHISE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ESSENTIALS FRANCHISE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ESSENTIALS FRANCHISE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Essentials Protective Coatings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named EPC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |